Ubiquitous
2021-12-16 02:05:00 UTC
On Wednesdays Mark Levin Show, a faculty member at NYU says that transsexual
liberation in and of itself is ineffective, but that the overall movement is
about a communist revolution to abolish society as it currently exists. This
sub-American Marxist movement is a force to be reckoned with because theyve
taken control of the culture. They run the universities, the media, and they
run the Democrat Party. These movements are not imaginary, they want to rule
your life, and cannot be ignored. Then, this January 6th committee is so
insidious that Adam Schiff went as far as to doctor the transcripts of text
messages from Mark Meadowss phone to misrepresent the facts during a
congressional hearing considering a criminal referral to hold a former White
House Chief of Staff in contempt of Congress. Later, US Senate candidate,
combat veteran, and former Ohio State Treasurer Josh Mandel calls in to
discuss his campaign and his support for President Trumps conservative
policies. Mandel says that traditional Judeo-Christian values are under
attack and must be defended if America is going to have a fighting chance of
succeeding in the future. Afterward, there is no reason for Congress to have
Trumps taxes; hes a private citizen. You dont see Congress subpoenaing
other former presidents as part of their legislative agenda to write tax
policy. If the Republicans win the House in 2022 they must step up and stop
this warped practice.
The Federalist
During January 6 Hearing, Schiff Doctored Text Messages Between Mark Meadows
And Rep. Jim Jordan
The Federalist
January 6 Committee Admits It Doctored Text Message Between Meadows And
Jordan
Rumble
Pelosi Defends Congressional Insider Trading: We Are A Free Market
The Hill
White House will commemorate Jan. 6 anniversary, Psaki says
Times of Israel
Report: US tells Israel new tanker jets, key to Iran strike, not coming
anytime soon
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
OK, Gabriel, now who would that be? Shes a faculty member at NYU New York
University. Its a big school, isnt it, Mr. Producer? Its always been
filled with Kamis, by the way. May I say that? I think I will. Gabriel, NYU
faculty member, in a video podcast in May of 2021, you know. A section of
American Marxism that I probably havent talked enough about is this
transgender movement of people want to do things through their body. Who am I
to stop them? Fact, you look at some people, they ought to do things to their
bodies, but you understand my point. But what is a movement, a transgender
movement? When I started to dig into this a little bit, I found out not all,
but a significant part of it, not all. But a significant part of it is once
again drawn back to this Marxist ideology. Now, Kay Gabriel, you wont hear
this anywhere else, Mr. Producer dug it up. Kay Gabriel, as I said, is a
faculty member, no doubt tenured, and I want you to understand whats going
on in our universities and colleges and now going on in our public school
system, kindergarten through 12. Whats going on in our corporate world?
Whats going on now in the military and elsewhere? I want you to listen to
this court. One go tranced Liberacion calls for communist revolution,
starting with the big one. OK, Im going to leave on this first, but then I
promise I will take a backseat. The dominant like, say, liberal bourgeois
reframing trans liberation, as trans rights recognitions say, based in the
supposedly successful pattern of like, say, gay liberation, transformed into
recognitions, realized how powerful the state in some places, not
everywhere. We make the claim that not only is this insufficient, but that
pouring our energy into this thing is actually not going to get us what we
want or what we need. This kind of economic transformation that would be a
kind of communist horizon, right? A world in which everyone has what they
need. So why is this why is this immediately matter to trans people? Well,
what do you trans people in our particularity have to to teach to say or to
offer that expands the universalism of a communist, a communist society.
Right. Which is to say when that would be achieved in time through processes
and events that we could call revolutionary, that we would have to call
revolutionary because they would require the abolition of society as it
currently is, that when we demand society be rearranged in certain ways, this
is a part of the project. Hmm. Now, a lot of this is for Bossidy. A lot of
its pedantic, but when you cut through the static, you get to the core
issues here. Its a professor, among others in this video podcast, May twenty
twenty one hat tip misinformed promoting communism. It requires, quote, the
abolition of society as it currently is, unquote, quote, that when we demand
that society be arranged in certain ways, this is part of the project, quote
unquote. I dont know why people doubt me, I dont know why people say, oh,
its a red scare, its not about a red scare, its about informing ourselves
about whats going on. Used to be under the radar. Now its closets wide
open. And this is something we must attend to deal with, this is something we
have to challenge and confront. And so this is May 2021 in a video podcast.
This is a professor. And shes not alone. Shes not alone in the least. Shes
promoting Marxism through gender ism, transgenderism. Its like promoting
Marxism through racism, promoting Marxism through socialism, the war on
private property rights and capitalism. These are sub American Marxist
movements. And they pull together and they overlap. Some people belong to the
various aspects of one or another, some dont. But nonetheless, this is a
force to deal with. Why, because theyve conquered much of the culture,
thats why they run the colleges and universities, they run the teachers
unions, they run the Democrat Party and they run the media, thats a lot. And
they run Hollywood and entertainment. Thats why they want to get rid of Fox,
or Newsmax. Thats why they want to get rid of talk radio, youre in the way.
Dont you understand? They want to fundamentally. Abolish the society as it
currently is, quote unquote, and they want to expand the universalism of a
communist society through time, of course, achieve it through time. Now, we
need to wake up to this fact, we need to wake up to this fact that these
movements do, in fact exist, theyre not a figment of my imagination. I also
think this is why American Marxism is the biggest book of twenty twenty one,
and it is ignored by virtually every single major book, promotion association
and book award system. Its even ignored by some of our conservative friends
on TV and radio. Because they have these. These weird pangs of jealousy or
something, I dont know what theyre promised doesnt matter, and this was
all done without social media. This was all done without an elaborate book
tour. This was all done because youre worried about your country and you
want to know the truth and you want to understand who these people are and
what the hells going on, and thats what I did in this book. But I want to
play this one more time. I didnt mean to hit you right up front with it.
Well, actually, I did, but it may have gone too fast. Hey, Gabriel, the NYU
faculty member in a video podcast, May 2021. And these faculties, theyre
incestuous. They hire people who share their ideology, many of them from the
same exact academic background or school. And so it just keeps going on and
on and on one go Tranced Liberacion calls for communist revolution, starting
with the big one. OK, Im going to leave on this first, but then I promise I
will take a backseat. The dominant like, say, liberal bourgeois reframing of
trans liberation as trans rights recognitions kind of say, based in the
supposedly successful pattern of like, say, gay liberation transformed into
some technicians realized that the state in some places, not everywhere, we
make the claim that not only is this insufficient, but that pouring our
energy into this thing is actually not going to get us what we want or what
we need. This kind of economic transformation that would be a kind of
communist horizon, right? A world in which everyone has what they need. So
why is this? Why is this where does everyone have what they need in some
communist revolution? I mean, it doesnt matter, but go ahead. Well, what do
you train people in our particularity have to to teach to say or to offer
that expands the universalism of a communist, a communist society. Right.
Which is to say when that would be achieved in time through processes and
events that we could call revolutionary, that we would have to call it
revolutionary because they would require the abolition of society as it
currently is, that when we demand society be rearranged in certain ways, this
is a part of the project. Notice the. No, notice the effort at sounding more
intelligent than she or he actually is the affectations. Yeah, the process.
You know, its weird to me when a communist society has these are the people
who want to rule your life. These are the people who want to destroy the
norms of a society. Its very important we talk about these things so we all
know whats taking place, this is what they mean by a white dominated
society. What they mean by a white dominated society, quite frankly, is by a
society that has certain norms. About men and women, about genitalium, about
freedom and individualism. And you have these disparate movements, these
individuals who reject. The norms of a society, and so they have to
character, assassinate people who associate with the norms of the society or
built the norms of this society. And thats why they are obsessed. With
racism, excuse me, with slavery 150 years ago, but so many excuse slavery in
China because theyre making big bucks and thats occurring today, today.
Ill be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
You know, in the book, I cite an article in all places, The Washington Post a
couple of decades back, and they interview a number of professors from
various, particularly Ivy League schools, and they openly say, look, yes, we
teach Marxism, but we dont do it the old way. Some push Marxism as an
economic model. Some use it as a climate model, some use it as a gender
model, and they go on and on and on. So whats happened in the United States?
The reason the book is called American Marxism and Not Marxism. Is because in
America, whats happened is these phony elites, there was a book written by a
gentleman, by the name of Warren, once brilliant man called The Opium of the
Intellectuals, the opening of the elites. And he points out that these people
really are disconnected from reality. But it doesnt matter. They. They are
they are in charge of what is taught and what passes for good judgment and so
forth and so on, while everybody else is working with their hands and their
minds trying to make a living. And that is precisely whats going on in this
country today, precisely whats going on. So I thought it was important to
point this out. I want to read you something, a letter to Kevin McCarthy from
a number of very important conservatives and conservatives in some cases that
run. Conservative organizations in the letter signed by, among others, former
Attorney General Ed Meese. In a variety of others, Ken Cuccinelli, former
attorney general of Virginia, Tony Perkins, president of Family Research
Council. Brent Bozell, the Media Research Center, and I could go on and on
and on, these are very, very important people. Been around a little while,
you know, and heres the letter that they sent to Kevin McCarthy, the
undersigned conservatives asked that the House Republican Conference act
immediately to remove to remove both Representative Liz Cheney and
Representative Adam Kinzinger from the Republican conference due to their
egregious actions as part of the House of Representatives January six select
committee. As you are aware, this committee has no formal representation from
Republicans, both Representatives Cheney and Kingsgrove serve at the request
of the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. As part of Pelosis team, Representatives
Cheney and Kingsgrove deliberately sought to undermine the privacy and due
process of their fellow Republicans. And those are private citizens with
improperly issued subpoenas and other investigatory tactics designed not to
pursue any valid legislative end. But merely to exploit for the sake of
political harassment and demagoguery. The actions of Representatives, Cheney
and Kinzinger on behalf of House Democrats have given supposedly bipartisan
justification to an overtly partisan political persecution that brings
disrespect to our countrys rule of law, legal harassment to private citizens
who have done nothing wrong and which demeans the standing of the house. As
duly elected representatives, Representatives Cheney and kings are free to
serve in the House, but they should no longer do so with the privileges
granted to members of the House Republican Conference, they should no longer
be given access to the benefits of a conference they actively seek to
undermine. We ask that the Republican conference meet immediately to vote on
stripping Representatives Cheney and King from their membership in the
Republican conference. We further inform you that conservative leaders are
launching a nationwide movement to add citizens voices to this effort.
Fantastic, among others, Ed Meese, Jim DeMint, Jenny Beth Martin. David
McIntosh of Club for Growth. Brent Bozell, our friend. Many, many others,
Ginni Thomas, President, Liberty Consulting, Gary Bauer. Cant read them all,
but these are very serious people, many of whom have been in the conservative
movement for half a century. Some served in the Reagan administration and so
forth and so on. Kenneth Blackwell, Matt Schlapp, Ken Cuccinelli, Tony
Perkins, Al Regnery, Cleta Mitchell, Ken Krip, Brooke Rollins. I can go on
and on and on. Seton Motley, Craig Shirley. All right. Thats it for now. But
you understand now the pressure is on and it needs to be on.
Hour 1 Segment 3
I want to thank Mike Pence for that. I should tell you, I will be on Hannity
tonight. Im not sure exactly the time, but typically its around nine thirty
p.m. Eastern time and I wont be on for a few more weeks as I take off on
Friday. So if you want to catch me on Hannity nine thirty PM Eastern Time,
you can catch me there. Were also going to have a Wonderful Life Liberty.
And in this Sunday, a brand new show at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. And our focus
is going to be Im not going to tell you because of the backbenchers. Thats
just leave it at that. Ill tell you tomorrow. But I think youre going to be
compelled, I think, to to watch it or to DVR it, as you mostly do. And I
appreciate that. So you might want to check that out this Sunday. Speaking of
January six, I want to underscore something. Yesterday, you heard me play a
clip of Liz Cheney and among other things that were really pretty outrageous
was her statement that Donald Trump could be criminally at fault for
dereliction of duty. Remember that, Mr. Misdemeanors for failing to act. And
then, of course, she had somebody named Allahpundit over at Hot Air, well
named, agreeing with her. Wow. Theyre circling the wagons. Didnt occur to
him, of course, that they have no criminal investigatory powers, certainly no
constitutional authority for such a thing. They dont even honor the Bill of
Rights due process, all the rest of the things that take place in a criminal
investigation. So theyre undermining the Constitution while pretending to
defend it. But this is the nature of fanaticism and fanaticism. But I did
catch my attention for another reason, as, again, I pointed out last night,
so the backbenchers will regurgitate it at some point. But let me underscore
it. If the deliberate failure, the deliberate failure to act is a crime, the
Nancy Pelosi needs to be under criminal investigation. What did Nancy Pelosi
do deliberately when she was offered to have the National Guard protect the
Capitol building? She turned them down. What exactly did Nancy Pelosi do in
preparation for January six? Did she do nothing deliberately while she would
have done nothing accidentally? And herein lies one of the issues, not all,
but one of them. When you have a nine zero committee appointed by Nancy
Pelosi, the purpose of which is to do her political dirty work and to damage
as many people as she possibly can trump and the people around Trump and
more. There is no way that this you hear the helicopter do you admire. Hold
on. Let me hold up the everybody. Listen here. I think theyre coming to get
me. No, I we have a Virginia home thats on the Potomac River and frequently
military helicopters, but also helicopters for dummy. When theyre going to
Camp David, they like to follow the Potomac River to a point including past
my house. So I dont know if thats dummying or not. I dont know whats
going on there. But when when weve had helicopters that to me look like
Hughies oh, my God, the whole house shakes. Feels like people who live near
trains. Thats what it feels like. Anyway, if the failure to deliberately to
fail to do your job, dereliction to do your job, as Liz Cheney pointed out,
then Nancy Pelosi should be in the crosshairs of a criminal investigation.
Its not Donald Trumps responsibility to defend the Capitol building. Hes
not in charge of the Capitol Police. She is. Hes not in charge of the
Metropolitan Police. The Democrat dummy who runs the city Boucherie, shes in
charge of them. He offered the National Guard. Thats all they can do. But
Kinzinger and Cheney are not concerned about that. No, no. And then theres
Adam Schiff on this committee who theyre also not concerned about. Adam
Schiff, if he were under oath, if you were under investigation, would be
doing a hard time at Leavenworth, breaking rocks with his precious hands. As
they point out at the Federalist, oops, he did it again after leaking fake
Donald Trump Jr emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call
between former President Trump and Ukraines president and lying about his
interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats. First
impeachment of Trump. Representative Adam Schiff is now running the same con
against a fellow lawmaker during a hearing Monday night on the riot at the US
Capitol on January six. Twenty twenty one, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof
that a member of Congress texted former White House Chief of Staff Mark
Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020
presidential election results. Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance
of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages
which were obtained and reviewed by the Federalist in their entirety. No, let
me stop there. Im talking to the Republicans on Capitol Hill, the
leadership, but all of them, Adam Schiff is an attorney, whether hes a
member of Congress or hes litigating in court or hes in House accounts or
what have you. Theres certain rules of professional responsibility that an
attorney, even one from California, must comply with. If you are
intentionally altering the text of messages to misrepresent the facts in a
matter that leads to you voting to hold a citizen in criminal contempt, you
should lose your license. You should lose your license to practice law now,
just so you folks know, any citizen is free to bring this to the attention of
the Ethics Committee of the Supreme Court of California. Any citizen. But I
would encourage the Republican members of the House of Representatives. I
hope some of you are listening to me. You dont even need a smart staff
lawyer to do this, to draw up an ethics complaint to be filed with the
relevant ethics committee of the Supreme Court of California and make it
clear that Adam Schiff, Adam Schiff took evidence, supposed evidence and
manipulated it and changed it. For the purpose of a congressional hearing,
seeking and pursuing a criminal complaint, criminal contempt against the
former chief of staff to the former president of the United States, let me
repeat what I pointed out here in the Federalist. During a hearing Monday
night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January six, twenty twenty one, Adam
Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress and I believe the
member that he was accusing was Jim Jordan texted former White House Chief of
Staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn
the 2020 presidential election results. Not only did Schiff misrepresent the
substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text
messages which were obtained and reviewed by the Federalists in their
entirety. So he should lose his law license. Quote, I want to display just a
few of the messages he received from people in Congress, Schiff said,
referring to Mark Meadows. The committee is not naming these lawmakers as
this time, at this time as our investigation. Knows ongoing, if we could cue
the first graphic, he says the following graphic, purportedly the text
message between a member of Congress and Meadows, then appeared on the
screen. It shifts direction ready quote. This one reads on January six,
twenty twenty one, Vice President Mike Pence is president of the Senate.
Should call at all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional is
no electoral votes at all. Schiff continued. You can see why this is so
critical to ask Mr. Meadows about, about a lawmaker suggesting that the
former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems
unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the
will of the people. This is the man who, of course, led the Russia collusion
effort to overthrow the 2016 election. Not only did Adam Schiff lie about the
substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored the messaging
graphic that he displayed on the screen during a statement. The full text
message, which was forwarded to Meadows from Representative Jim Jordan on
the evening of Monday, January five, was significantly longer than what
Schiff read and put on screen. But Schiff erased significant portions of the
text and added punctuation, where there was none to give the impression that
Jim Jordan himself was personally directing Meadows to give orders to Pence
on how to handle the electoral vote certification. The original text was
written by Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector
General Joseph Schmitz and included an attachment of a four page draft word
document drafted by Schmitz that detailed his legal reasoning for suggesting
that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of
electoral votes submitted by a handful of states, meaning they were in
conflict, they were in controversy. The piece that Schmitz had sent to Jordan
was published at the website every legal vote the next day and even included
the same discussion draft quote unquote, headline and time stamp on the
document that Schmidt sent to Jordan. So it was the evening of January 5th,
not January 6th as well. Good luck tomorrow. Schmitts texted Jordan on the
evening of January 5th, including the word document as an attachment. Schmidt
then texted to Jordan a three paragraph summary of his word document, which
Schiff sliced and diced and then attributed to Congressman Jordan. Quote, On
January six, twenty twenty one Vice President Mike Pence as president of the
Senate should call at all the electoral votes that he believes are
unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all. In accordance with guidance
from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedents, Schmidt text
it in its graphic Shefer Race, the final clause and the M dash preceding it
and added a period to the first clause without disclosing that he or his
staff had chopped up the text and created a fake graphic misrepresenting the
actual contents of the text message, Schmidt continued. No legislative act
wrote on Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Number 78, contrary to the
Constitution, could be valid. The court in Hubbard vs. Lowe reinforced this
truth. That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition
no longer open to discussion. Following this rationale and unconstitutionally
appointed elector like an unconstitutionally enacted statute is now electret.
All Schmidts right. And by the way, this is a serious point. A serious
point. Its not about ballots, its not about machines, it is a serious
constitutional point. That if electors are chosen in a way that violates the
federal constitution, that is a system set up by a governor or lieutenant
governor, by secretary of state, a board of elections or even a state court
that violates the federal constitution. Now, they quite knew that in Bush
versus Gore, the Supreme Court knew that in 2000, the Bushes the Chinese knew
that in 2000. In his statement, an on screen graphic, Shefer Race, the final
two paragraphs and the final clause of the first paragraph of the text before
inserting punctuation that was never there at all without disclosing what he
was doing. He doctored it and he distorted it. He doctored it and he
distorted it. Multiple sources who regularly communicate with Jordan scoffed
at the idea that Jordan, whos known for writing only brief one or two word
texts, if at all, would sit down and type out a multiple paragraph narrative
with precise legal citations akin to a lengthy court brief. Schiff and his
team have a long history of doctoring and fabricating evidence to show their
political enemies in the worst possible light. While Trump Jr. was testifying
during a twenty seventeen hearing on Russia collusion, the committee leaked
CNN and NBC emails purportedly from Trump Jr. that showed he had communicated
with someone about hacked WikiLeaks documents prior to the public. Release a
lie. Ill be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
All right, two things need to happen, an ethics complaint filed with the the
Ethics Committee of the Supreme Court of California against Adam Schiff,
helping the Republicans in the House will do this. Youre not free to doctor
evidence, not even in a congressional form that seeks to hold somebody in
criminal contempt and send them to prison. Thats number one. Number two, Im
also hopeful that the Republicans in the House will file an ethics complaint
against Adam Schiff as well as the full committee because he cant tell me
the full committee didnt know this and an investigation is warranted
immediately, immediately. So I encourage those two complaints to be filed
immediately. Dont forget, Ill be on Hannity nine thirty PM Eastern Time
tonight for the last time in several weeks. Dont forget to grab your copies
of American Marxism there, 14 million, 50 percent off over at Amazon. Ill be
right back.
liberation in and of itself is ineffective, but that the overall movement is
about a communist revolution to abolish society as it currently exists. This
sub-American Marxist movement is a force to be reckoned with because theyve
taken control of the culture. They run the universities, the media, and they
run the Democrat Party. These movements are not imaginary, they want to rule
your life, and cannot be ignored. Then, this January 6th committee is so
insidious that Adam Schiff went as far as to doctor the transcripts of text
messages from Mark Meadowss phone to misrepresent the facts during a
congressional hearing considering a criminal referral to hold a former White
House Chief of Staff in contempt of Congress. Later, US Senate candidate,
combat veteran, and former Ohio State Treasurer Josh Mandel calls in to
discuss his campaign and his support for President Trumps conservative
policies. Mandel says that traditional Judeo-Christian values are under
attack and must be defended if America is going to have a fighting chance of
succeeding in the future. Afterward, there is no reason for Congress to have
Trumps taxes; hes a private citizen. You dont see Congress subpoenaing
other former presidents as part of their legislative agenda to write tax
policy. If the Republicans win the House in 2022 they must step up and stop
this warped practice.
The Federalist
During January 6 Hearing, Schiff Doctored Text Messages Between Mark Meadows
And Rep. Jim Jordan
The Federalist
January 6 Committee Admits It Doctored Text Message Between Meadows And
Jordan
Rumble
Pelosi Defends Congressional Insider Trading: We Are A Free Market
The Hill
White House will commemorate Jan. 6 anniversary, Psaki says
Times of Israel
Report: US tells Israel new tanker jets, key to Iran strike, not coming
anytime soon
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
OK, Gabriel, now who would that be? Shes a faculty member at NYU New York
University. Its a big school, isnt it, Mr. Producer? Its always been
filled with Kamis, by the way. May I say that? I think I will. Gabriel, NYU
faculty member, in a video podcast in May of 2021, you know. A section of
American Marxism that I probably havent talked enough about is this
transgender movement of people want to do things through their body. Who am I
to stop them? Fact, you look at some people, they ought to do things to their
bodies, but you understand my point. But what is a movement, a transgender
movement? When I started to dig into this a little bit, I found out not all,
but a significant part of it, not all. But a significant part of it is once
again drawn back to this Marxist ideology. Now, Kay Gabriel, you wont hear
this anywhere else, Mr. Producer dug it up. Kay Gabriel, as I said, is a
faculty member, no doubt tenured, and I want you to understand whats going
on in our universities and colleges and now going on in our public school
system, kindergarten through 12. Whats going on in our corporate world?
Whats going on now in the military and elsewhere? I want you to listen to
this court. One go tranced Liberacion calls for communist revolution,
starting with the big one. OK, Im going to leave on this first, but then I
promise I will take a backseat. The dominant like, say, liberal bourgeois
reframing trans liberation, as trans rights recognitions say, based in the
supposedly successful pattern of like, say, gay liberation, transformed into
recognitions, realized how powerful the state in some places, not
everywhere. We make the claim that not only is this insufficient, but that
pouring our energy into this thing is actually not going to get us what we
want or what we need. This kind of economic transformation that would be a
kind of communist horizon, right? A world in which everyone has what they
need. So why is this why is this immediately matter to trans people? Well,
what do you trans people in our particularity have to to teach to say or to
offer that expands the universalism of a communist, a communist society.
Right. Which is to say when that would be achieved in time through processes
and events that we could call revolutionary, that we would have to call
revolutionary because they would require the abolition of society as it
currently is, that when we demand society be rearranged in certain ways, this
is a part of the project. Hmm. Now, a lot of this is for Bossidy. A lot of
its pedantic, but when you cut through the static, you get to the core
issues here. Its a professor, among others in this video podcast, May twenty
twenty one hat tip misinformed promoting communism. It requires, quote, the
abolition of society as it currently is, unquote, quote, that when we demand
that society be arranged in certain ways, this is part of the project, quote
unquote. I dont know why people doubt me, I dont know why people say, oh,
its a red scare, its not about a red scare, its about informing ourselves
about whats going on. Used to be under the radar. Now its closets wide
open. And this is something we must attend to deal with, this is something we
have to challenge and confront. And so this is May 2021 in a video podcast.
This is a professor. And shes not alone. Shes not alone in the least. Shes
promoting Marxism through gender ism, transgenderism. Its like promoting
Marxism through racism, promoting Marxism through socialism, the war on
private property rights and capitalism. These are sub American Marxist
movements. And they pull together and they overlap. Some people belong to the
various aspects of one or another, some dont. But nonetheless, this is a
force to deal with. Why, because theyve conquered much of the culture,
thats why they run the colleges and universities, they run the teachers
unions, they run the Democrat Party and they run the media, thats a lot. And
they run Hollywood and entertainment. Thats why they want to get rid of Fox,
or Newsmax. Thats why they want to get rid of talk radio, youre in the way.
Dont you understand? They want to fundamentally. Abolish the society as it
currently is, quote unquote, and they want to expand the universalism of a
communist society through time, of course, achieve it through time. Now, we
need to wake up to this fact, we need to wake up to this fact that these
movements do, in fact exist, theyre not a figment of my imagination. I also
think this is why American Marxism is the biggest book of twenty twenty one,
and it is ignored by virtually every single major book, promotion association
and book award system. Its even ignored by some of our conservative friends
on TV and radio. Because they have these. These weird pangs of jealousy or
something, I dont know what theyre promised doesnt matter, and this was
all done without social media. This was all done without an elaborate book
tour. This was all done because youre worried about your country and you
want to know the truth and you want to understand who these people are and
what the hells going on, and thats what I did in this book. But I want to
play this one more time. I didnt mean to hit you right up front with it.
Well, actually, I did, but it may have gone too fast. Hey, Gabriel, the NYU
faculty member in a video podcast, May 2021. And these faculties, theyre
incestuous. They hire people who share their ideology, many of them from the
same exact academic background or school. And so it just keeps going on and
on and on one go Tranced Liberacion calls for communist revolution, starting
with the big one. OK, Im going to leave on this first, but then I promise I
will take a backseat. The dominant like, say, liberal bourgeois reframing of
trans liberation as trans rights recognitions kind of say, based in the
supposedly successful pattern of like, say, gay liberation transformed into
some technicians realized that the state in some places, not everywhere, we
make the claim that not only is this insufficient, but that pouring our
energy into this thing is actually not going to get us what we want or what
we need. This kind of economic transformation that would be a kind of
communist horizon, right? A world in which everyone has what they need. So
why is this? Why is this where does everyone have what they need in some
communist revolution? I mean, it doesnt matter, but go ahead. Well, what do
you train people in our particularity have to to teach to say or to offer
that expands the universalism of a communist, a communist society. Right.
Which is to say when that would be achieved in time through processes and
events that we could call revolutionary, that we would have to call it
revolutionary because they would require the abolition of society as it
currently is, that when we demand society be rearranged in certain ways, this
is a part of the project. Notice the. No, notice the effort at sounding more
intelligent than she or he actually is the affectations. Yeah, the process.
You know, its weird to me when a communist society has these are the people
who want to rule your life. These are the people who want to destroy the
norms of a society. Its very important we talk about these things so we all
know whats taking place, this is what they mean by a white dominated
society. What they mean by a white dominated society, quite frankly, is by a
society that has certain norms. About men and women, about genitalium, about
freedom and individualism. And you have these disparate movements, these
individuals who reject. The norms of a society, and so they have to
character, assassinate people who associate with the norms of the society or
built the norms of this society. And thats why they are obsessed. With
racism, excuse me, with slavery 150 years ago, but so many excuse slavery in
China because theyre making big bucks and thats occurring today, today.
Ill be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
You know, in the book, I cite an article in all places, The Washington Post a
couple of decades back, and they interview a number of professors from
various, particularly Ivy League schools, and they openly say, look, yes, we
teach Marxism, but we dont do it the old way. Some push Marxism as an
economic model. Some use it as a climate model, some use it as a gender
model, and they go on and on and on. So whats happened in the United States?
The reason the book is called American Marxism and Not Marxism. Is because in
America, whats happened is these phony elites, there was a book written by a
gentleman, by the name of Warren, once brilliant man called The Opium of the
Intellectuals, the opening of the elites. And he points out that these people
really are disconnected from reality. But it doesnt matter. They. They are
they are in charge of what is taught and what passes for good judgment and so
forth and so on, while everybody else is working with their hands and their
minds trying to make a living. And that is precisely whats going on in this
country today, precisely whats going on. So I thought it was important to
point this out. I want to read you something, a letter to Kevin McCarthy from
a number of very important conservatives and conservatives in some cases that
run. Conservative organizations in the letter signed by, among others, former
Attorney General Ed Meese. In a variety of others, Ken Cuccinelli, former
attorney general of Virginia, Tony Perkins, president of Family Research
Council. Brent Bozell, the Media Research Center, and I could go on and on
and on, these are very, very important people. Been around a little while,
you know, and heres the letter that they sent to Kevin McCarthy, the
undersigned conservatives asked that the House Republican Conference act
immediately to remove to remove both Representative Liz Cheney and
Representative Adam Kinzinger from the Republican conference due to their
egregious actions as part of the House of Representatives January six select
committee. As you are aware, this committee has no formal representation from
Republicans, both Representatives Cheney and Kingsgrove serve at the request
of the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. As part of Pelosis team, Representatives
Cheney and Kingsgrove deliberately sought to undermine the privacy and due
process of their fellow Republicans. And those are private citizens with
improperly issued subpoenas and other investigatory tactics designed not to
pursue any valid legislative end. But merely to exploit for the sake of
political harassment and demagoguery. The actions of Representatives, Cheney
and Kinzinger on behalf of House Democrats have given supposedly bipartisan
justification to an overtly partisan political persecution that brings
disrespect to our countrys rule of law, legal harassment to private citizens
who have done nothing wrong and which demeans the standing of the house. As
duly elected representatives, Representatives Cheney and kings are free to
serve in the House, but they should no longer do so with the privileges
granted to members of the House Republican Conference, they should no longer
be given access to the benefits of a conference they actively seek to
undermine. We ask that the Republican conference meet immediately to vote on
stripping Representatives Cheney and King from their membership in the
Republican conference. We further inform you that conservative leaders are
launching a nationwide movement to add citizens voices to this effort.
Fantastic, among others, Ed Meese, Jim DeMint, Jenny Beth Martin. David
McIntosh of Club for Growth. Brent Bozell, our friend. Many, many others,
Ginni Thomas, President, Liberty Consulting, Gary Bauer. Cant read them all,
but these are very serious people, many of whom have been in the conservative
movement for half a century. Some served in the Reagan administration and so
forth and so on. Kenneth Blackwell, Matt Schlapp, Ken Cuccinelli, Tony
Perkins, Al Regnery, Cleta Mitchell, Ken Krip, Brooke Rollins. I can go on
and on and on. Seton Motley, Craig Shirley. All right. Thats it for now. But
you understand now the pressure is on and it needs to be on.
Hour 1 Segment 3
I want to thank Mike Pence for that. I should tell you, I will be on Hannity
tonight. Im not sure exactly the time, but typically its around nine thirty
p.m. Eastern time and I wont be on for a few more weeks as I take off on
Friday. So if you want to catch me on Hannity nine thirty PM Eastern Time,
you can catch me there. Were also going to have a Wonderful Life Liberty.
And in this Sunday, a brand new show at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. And our focus
is going to be Im not going to tell you because of the backbenchers. Thats
just leave it at that. Ill tell you tomorrow. But I think youre going to be
compelled, I think, to to watch it or to DVR it, as you mostly do. And I
appreciate that. So you might want to check that out this Sunday. Speaking of
January six, I want to underscore something. Yesterday, you heard me play a
clip of Liz Cheney and among other things that were really pretty outrageous
was her statement that Donald Trump could be criminally at fault for
dereliction of duty. Remember that, Mr. Misdemeanors for failing to act. And
then, of course, she had somebody named Allahpundit over at Hot Air, well
named, agreeing with her. Wow. Theyre circling the wagons. Didnt occur to
him, of course, that they have no criminal investigatory powers, certainly no
constitutional authority for such a thing. They dont even honor the Bill of
Rights due process, all the rest of the things that take place in a criminal
investigation. So theyre undermining the Constitution while pretending to
defend it. But this is the nature of fanaticism and fanaticism. But I did
catch my attention for another reason, as, again, I pointed out last night,
so the backbenchers will regurgitate it at some point. But let me underscore
it. If the deliberate failure, the deliberate failure to act is a crime, the
Nancy Pelosi needs to be under criminal investigation. What did Nancy Pelosi
do deliberately when she was offered to have the National Guard protect the
Capitol building? She turned them down. What exactly did Nancy Pelosi do in
preparation for January six? Did she do nothing deliberately while she would
have done nothing accidentally? And herein lies one of the issues, not all,
but one of them. When you have a nine zero committee appointed by Nancy
Pelosi, the purpose of which is to do her political dirty work and to damage
as many people as she possibly can trump and the people around Trump and
more. There is no way that this you hear the helicopter do you admire. Hold
on. Let me hold up the everybody. Listen here. I think theyre coming to get
me. No, I we have a Virginia home thats on the Potomac River and frequently
military helicopters, but also helicopters for dummy. When theyre going to
Camp David, they like to follow the Potomac River to a point including past
my house. So I dont know if thats dummying or not. I dont know whats
going on there. But when when weve had helicopters that to me look like
Hughies oh, my God, the whole house shakes. Feels like people who live near
trains. Thats what it feels like. Anyway, if the failure to deliberately to
fail to do your job, dereliction to do your job, as Liz Cheney pointed out,
then Nancy Pelosi should be in the crosshairs of a criminal investigation.
Its not Donald Trumps responsibility to defend the Capitol building. Hes
not in charge of the Capitol Police. She is. Hes not in charge of the
Metropolitan Police. The Democrat dummy who runs the city Boucherie, shes in
charge of them. He offered the National Guard. Thats all they can do. But
Kinzinger and Cheney are not concerned about that. No, no. And then theres
Adam Schiff on this committee who theyre also not concerned about. Adam
Schiff, if he were under oath, if you were under investigation, would be
doing a hard time at Leavenworth, breaking rocks with his precious hands. As
they point out at the Federalist, oops, he did it again after leaking fake
Donald Trump Jr emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call
between former President Trump and Ukraines president and lying about his
interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats. First
impeachment of Trump. Representative Adam Schiff is now running the same con
against a fellow lawmaker during a hearing Monday night on the riot at the US
Capitol on January six. Twenty twenty one, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof
that a member of Congress texted former White House Chief of Staff Mark
Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020
presidential election results. Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance
of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages
which were obtained and reviewed by the Federalist in their entirety. No, let
me stop there. Im talking to the Republicans on Capitol Hill, the
leadership, but all of them, Adam Schiff is an attorney, whether hes a
member of Congress or hes litigating in court or hes in House accounts or
what have you. Theres certain rules of professional responsibility that an
attorney, even one from California, must comply with. If you are
intentionally altering the text of messages to misrepresent the facts in a
matter that leads to you voting to hold a citizen in criminal contempt, you
should lose your license. You should lose your license to practice law now,
just so you folks know, any citizen is free to bring this to the attention of
the Ethics Committee of the Supreme Court of California. Any citizen. But I
would encourage the Republican members of the House of Representatives. I
hope some of you are listening to me. You dont even need a smart staff
lawyer to do this, to draw up an ethics complaint to be filed with the
relevant ethics committee of the Supreme Court of California and make it
clear that Adam Schiff, Adam Schiff took evidence, supposed evidence and
manipulated it and changed it. For the purpose of a congressional hearing,
seeking and pursuing a criminal complaint, criminal contempt against the
former chief of staff to the former president of the United States, let me
repeat what I pointed out here in the Federalist. During a hearing Monday
night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January six, twenty twenty one, Adam
Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress and I believe the
member that he was accusing was Jim Jordan texted former White House Chief of
Staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn
the 2020 presidential election results. Not only did Schiff misrepresent the
substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text
messages which were obtained and reviewed by the Federalists in their
entirety. So he should lose his law license. Quote, I want to display just a
few of the messages he received from people in Congress, Schiff said,
referring to Mark Meadows. The committee is not naming these lawmakers as
this time, at this time as our investigation. Knows ongoing, if we could cue
the first graphic, he says the following graphic, purportedly the text
message between a member of Congress and Meadows, then appeared on the
screen. It shifts direction ready quote. This one reads on January six,
twenty twenty one, Vice President Mike Pence is president of the Senate.
Should call at all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional is
no electoral votes at all. Schiff continued. You can see why this is so
critical to ask Mr. Meadows about, about a lawmaker suggesting that the
former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems
unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the
will of the people. This is the man who, of course, led the Russia collusion
effort to overthrow the 2016 election. Not only did Adam Schiff lie about the
substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored the messaging
graphic that he displayed on the screen during a statement. The full text
message, which was forwarded to Meadows from Representative Jim Jordan on
the evening of Monday, January five, was significantly longer than what
Schiff read and put on screen. But Schiff erased significant portions of the
text and added punctuation, where there was none to give the impression that
Jim Jordan himself was personally directing Meadows to give orders to Pence
on how to handle the electoral vote certification. The original text was
written by Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector
General Joseph Schmitz and included an attachment of a four page draft word
document drafted by Schmitz that detailed his legal reasoning for suggesting
that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of
electoral votes submitted by a handful of states, meaning they were in
conflict, they were in controversy. The piece that Schmitz had sent to Jordan
was published at the website every legal vote the next day and even included
the same discussion draft quote unquote, headline and time stamp on the
document that Schmidt sent to Jordan. So it was the evening of January 5th,
not January 6th as well. Good luck tomorrow. Schmitts texted Jordan on the
evening of January 5th, including the word document as an attachment. Schmidt
then texted to Jordan a three paragraph summary of his word document, which
Schiff sliced and diced and then attributed to Congressman Jordan. Quote, On
January six, twenty twenty one Vice President Mike Pence as president of the
Senate should call at all the electoral votes that he believes are
unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all. In accordance with guidance
from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedents, Schmidt text
it in its graphic Shefer Race, the final clause and the M dash preceding it
and added a period to the first clause without disclosing that he or his
staff had chopped up the text and created a fake graphic misrepresenting the
actual contents of the text message, Schmidt continued. No legislative act
wrote on Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Number 78, contrary to the
Constitution, could be valid. The court in Hubbard vs. Lowe reinforced this
truth. That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition
no longer open to discussion. Following this rationale and unconstitutionally
appointed elector like an unconstitutionally enacted statute is now electret.
All Schmidts right. And by the way, this is a serious point. A serious
point. Its not about ballots, its not about machines, it is a serious
constitutional point. That if electors are chosen in a way that violates the
federal constitution, that is a system set up by a governor or lieutenant
governor, by secretary of state, a board of elections or even a state court
that violates the federal constitution. Now, they quite knew that in Bush
versus Gore, the Supreme Court knew that in 2000, the Bushes the Chinese knew
that in 2000. In his statement, an on screen graphic, Shefer Race, the final
two paragraphs and the final clause of the first paragraph of the text before
inserting punctuation that was never there at all without disclosing what he
was doing. He doctored it and he distorted it. He doctored it and he
distorted it. Multiple sources who regularly communicate with Jordan scoffed
at the idea that Jordan, whos known for writing only brief one or two word
texts, if at all, would sit down and type out a multiple paragraph narrative
with precise legal citations akin to a lengthy court brief. Schiff and his
team have a long history of doctoring and fabricating evidence to show their
political enemies in the worst possible light. While Trump Jr. was testifying
during a twenty seventeen hearing on Russia collusion, the committee leaked
CNN and NBC emails purportedly from Trump Jr. that showed he had communicated
with someone about hacked WikiLeaks documents prior to the public. Release a
lie. Ill be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
All right, two things need to happen, an ethics complaint filed with the the
Ethics Committee of the Supreme Court of California against Adam Schiff,
helping the Republicans in the House will do this. Youre not free to doctor
evidence, not even in a congressional form that seeks to hold somebody in
criminal contempt and send them to prison. Thats number one. Number two, Im
also hopeful that the Republicans in the House will file an ethics complaint
against Adam Schiff as well as the full committee because he cant tell me
the full committee didnt know this and an investigation is warranted
immediately, immediately. So I encourage those two complaints to be filed
immediately. Dont forget, Ill be on Hannity nine thirty PM Eastern Time
tonight for the last time in several weeks. Dont forget to grab your copies
of American Marxism there, 14 million, 50 percent off over at Amazon. Ill be
right back.